Moranthology – Caitlin Moran

moranthologyHaving loved Caitlin Moran’s How to be a Woman, the only logical consequense was to read Moranthology as soon as I got my hands on it. Moranthology is an anthology, with comments, of selected columns Moran has written for The Times, and the subjects range from big hair and gay moon landings to the welfare state and the eurozone.

As with How to be a Woman, Moran is both profound and side-achingly funny, quite frequently at the same time. Her explanation of why she loves to pay tax is spot on, as is the piece on why a pregnancy, especially an unwanted one, is not ‘a gift’.

In short, I loved it. Read it and learn. Or laugh. Or, even better, both.

Used and Rare – Lawrence and Nancy Goldstone

goldstone_usedI don’t know what prompted me to want to reread Used and Rare (again), but Västmanländskans challenge to read books-about-books in preparation for World Book Day pushed me to actually take it down.

As I’ve only ever blogged about this book on the occasion of another reread, my comment was rather short, and I think it deserves better, as it really is an excellent book.

We follow the authors through their discovery of book-collecting – as in buying specific editions of books rather than just amassing reading copies. The whole «adventure» starts because they challenge each other to spend no more than 20 dollars on birthday presents. One of them decides to get the other a nice hardback copy of War and Peace, which turns out to be pretty impossible without hitting the used book stores. The successful hunt for War and Peace make them realise they can get nicer, more readable copies of books they want to own used than new, and they set out to replace some of their paperbacks with hardbacks. However, and this is eerily familiar, with books – when you’re a bit of a bibliophile – one thing tends to lead to another. The first major hurdle is reachen when they find a copy of Orwell’s 1984:

We took the book off the shelf and opened the cover. «1st US,» it read. «$100.»
We looked it over. It seemed to be in excellent condition.
«Don’t we have this?»
«I don’t think so. Maybe in paperback.»
«Maybe.» We were fondling the book now. «Too bad. This is a great book. You’ve read it, haven’t you?»
«In high school.»
«You should read it again. You can’t appreciate it in high school.»
«It’s a hundred dollars.»
«I know. We can’t buy a hundred-dollar book. It’s out of the question. Let’s just put it back.»
«Right.» The book had not left our hands.
«Too bad. It’s a great book. It’s probably a good deal. Orwell certainly won’t drop in value.»
«No, Orwell won’t.»
«That’s the good thing about firsts. You know they won’t drop in value.»
«That’s true.» As if we had any idea at all of what we were talking about.
«That means that if we wait it will only go up in value.»
«So we’re probably actually saving money if we buy it now.»

(p. 72) Along which I’ve noted in the margin: «Rings a bell.»

On the following page, they take their purchases to the desk, and the owner starts noting down the prices:

…$8.95, $5.00, $6.50. Then he came to Nineteen Eighty-four.

He stopped and looked up. «What exactly do you collect?» he asked.

Up until that moment, we had never felt like we «collected» anything. We were just two people who bought used books.

«Uh, we only buy books we like to read.»

«How unusual.»

One of the reasons I like this book is, I suppose, that my own book-collecting started in much the same way. I remember trying to get hold of The Colour Purple in hardback and realising the only way I could do that was by buying it second-hand. This was way back when, the internet barely existed (Mosaic – a browser showing pictures inline – was hot news), and Norwegian used book stores are not exactly noted for their excellent selection of books in English. I had to settle for The Colour Purple in paperback – I needed it for a course – but over the next few years I increasingly tried to find used hardbacks of books I wanted to own (which, to be honest, was pretty much every book I needed to read).

So the Goldstone’s journey into the bookworld is familiar (though I envy them their local selection of bookshops). The book also serves as a bit of a primer (though not in the dry language of most primers) on book collecting terms and common mistakes. If you’re new to the game you can learn along with the authors, and even if you’re not you’re likely to learn something new.

I also like the way the story is told in the plural «we». It is only very occasionally possible to tell whether it is Lawrence or Nancy speaking, as in the dialogue above.

On the whole then: I like it.

McCaffrey reread

As mentioned, I’ve been rereading. To be more specific: Dragonsong, Dragonsinger, Dragondrums and The White Dragon by Anne McCaffrey. It seems I only ever said a few words about the first three and never even blogged The White Dragon at all. So I have no idea when I first read it. Annoying.

Anyway, what with the blogging backlog I have (of the 70-odd books I’ve read this year, I’ve only blogged 20 or so), this is nor going to be much of a review either, but at least I have now got it on record. I read them.

I love Dragonsong and Dragonsinger, actually. Menolly is such an engaging character. Dragondrums is nice, but feels a bit short, I feel Piemur deserved a few more pages. The White Dragon is substantially longer, and so Jaxom and Ruth get their time in the limelight, but I found the repeated agonising over Ruth’s lack of interest in mating a bit tedious this time around. It seems unimportant to me, an interesting point to underline his otherness dragonwise, but no more than that.

I was well into the Pern universe once I finished, and if I’d had Moreta – Dragonlady of Pern on hand I would likely have continued with that, but I haven’t. I might get the ebook, but by now – two completely different books later – I am not in such a hurry, and Mt TBR is telling me I really do not need to buy any books for a looooong while*. So we’ll see.

———–

* That said, I ordered three today: Moranthology, The Casual Vacancy and Hitta vilse. So I’m obviously mostly deaf to that voice.

Finns inte på kartan – Carin Hjulström

hjulströmCarin Hjulströms Finns inte på kartan kjøpte jeg etter å ha lest om den på en svensk bokblogg. (Om jeg nå bare kunne huske hvilken…) I alle fall, den ble omtalt i rosende ordelag og jeg ble interessert nok til at jeg nesten kjøpte oppfølgeren Hitta vilse i samme slengen, men et anfall av fornuft gjorde at jeg lot den stå i tilfelle jeg ikke ville være enig med bloggeren om Hjulströms fortreffelighet.

Det angrer jeg på nå. Ja, ja. Det tar jo ikke mange dagene å få den fra Adlibris, selvsagt. (Forresten: 39 kroner! Man burde jo egentlig bare slutte å lese på noe annet språk enn svensk med de pocketprisene de klarer å holde. Nåja, en digresjon.)

Frida Fors går journalisthøyskolen i Göteborg, og det er på tide med et semesters utplassering. Ikke alle kan få plass hos Aftonbladet eller tilsvarende spennende steder, men de fleste studentene er likevel fornøyd. Ikke Frida. Frida får plass hos Smålandsbladet – i lokalredaksjonen i Bruseryd, et sted som er så lite og begivenhetsløst at det knapt finnes på kartet. På toppen av det hele slår kjæresten Peter – som har fått plass hos nettopp Aftonbladet – opp, for, som han sier, at hun skal være fri til å møte andre det halve året. Joda.

Så Frida starter på praksisen uten den helt store entusiasmen. Men Frida er faktisk en ganske god journalistspire, for hun får folk til å snakke. Og når hun tråkker skikkelig i salaten med en av sine første saker, og får hele lokalsamfunnet i harnisk, viser det seg å være en nyttig katalysator snarere enn en karrieredrepende tabbe.

Frida er en velskreven hovedperson, en troverdig ung dame som ikke helt har funnet seg selv.

– Var dig själv bara. Det är nog det enda råd jag kan ge. Bara var som du är, sa Inger, vinkade till sig bartendern och satte de två i kontakt med varandra. Öl eller vin?

Frida beställde ett glas rött och betalade. Men om man inte visste vem man var, hur skulle man vara då? tänkte Frida. Det lät så enkelt att vara sig själv. Var det bara hon som inte visste?

(s. 66) Det vil si, det har hun nok på sett og vis, hun er bare ikke klar over det. Frida er på mange måter den mest ærlige personen i boka, men hun har ikke – til å begynne med – selvtillit nok til å stole på seg selv. Forholdet til Peter er et godt eksempel, han har sagt at han skal tenke for henne, hun behøver ikke å bekymre seg for noen ting. Ok, det høres behagelig ut, tenker Frida, og lar seg rive med. Når han da plutselig forsvinner må hun jo tenke selv igjen. Det kjennes nok ganske skremmende, men er selvsagt det beste som kunne skjedd henne.

Hjulström har prestert en riktig så lesverdig bok, altså. Man blir glad i Frida, men man blir også ganske glad i de fleste av bipersonene, selv om de har sine feil alle sammen. Og historien har et godt driv, selv om det ikke akkurat er begivenheter av verdenshistorisk interesse som foregår. For de involverte er det likevel livsviktige saker som skjer. Anbefales!

How to be a Woman – Caitlin Moran

moranLet me just start off by saying this book should probably be mandatory reading for all teenage girls – and it wouldn’t exactly hurt if the boys read it too. In fact, I’m considering purchasing a couple of copies for the library at the lass’ school, and don’t be surprised if I start giving away copies to friends’ daugthers.

Which is not to say you don’t need to read this book if you’re past your teens. Every woman of every age could do with reading it, and you men? If you are really interested in «understanding women» then this book will definitely help.

Now then:

Caitlin Moran has written something which is a cross between an authobiography, a feminist pamphlet, a stand-up comic’s script and a rant. And she has done it in such an eminently readable way that reading it is pure, unalloyed pleasure.

I have a rule of thumb that allows me to judge – when time is pressing, and one needs to make a snap judgement – whether some sexist bullshit is afoot. Obviously it’s not 100 per cent infallible but,  by and large, it definitely points you in the right direction.

And it’s asking this question: ‘ Are the men doing it? Are the men worrying about this as well? Is this taking up the men’s time? Are the men told not to do this, as ‘it’s letting the side down’? Are the men having to write bloody books about this exasperating, retarded, time-wasting bullshit? Is this making Jeremy Clarkson feel insecure?’

Almost always the answer is ‘No. The boys are not being told they have to be a certain way. They’re just getting on with stuff.’

Men are not being informed that they are opressing other men with their comments. It is presumed that men can handle perfectly well the idea of other men bitching about them. I think, on this basis, we can presume women can cope with other women being bitchy about them, too.

Now, there are things Caitlin Moran says I don’t agree with, but not very many. I’m with her on the high heels (just don’t), I’m with her on the muff (and pretty much on the hairyness issue altogether) and I think she has a pretty shrewd analysis on why a lot of women overeat as an addiction, just to mention a few.

In short, read it!

For more quotes and Morany goodness in general, check out Fuck yeah Caitlin Moran on Tumblr.

And you can follow Caitlin Moran on Twitter, too: @caitlinmoran.

The No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency – Alexander McCall Smith

no1ladiesI don’t know that I have much to add, since I actually managed more than one line on this book the first time I read it. We agreed in the book club to pick a few «light» reads to cover over the summer, and for everyone to bring suggestions, rather than just one of us (we’ve been taking turns in suggesting the next read so far). The idea was to read crime novels and such ilk, and since there is a limit to how many crime novels I read I was somewhat stuck as to what to suggest, until I remembered that Mma Ramotswe is indeed filed under «Crime» in most bookshops. Since one of my missions in life is to get everyone in the world to read at least one Alexander McCall Smith novel (I figure most sensible people will continue on to read more once I get them to read one), <em>The No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency</em> was the perfect choice, I thought, and luckily it was indeed one of the four titles chosen for our summer reading.

Anyway, I reread it. I loved it all over again. And I now strongly suspect I will have to reread some of the other early books in the series. We’ll see.

Smakebit på søndag: A Truth Universally Acknowledged

austen33I’m making my (very pleasant) way through A Truth Universally Acknowledged – 33 Reasons why we can’t stop reading Jane Austen at the moment. I picked it up in London in March – at the British Library bookshop. Edited by Susannah Carson, it contains 33 essays on the topic of reading Jane Austen, as well as a foreword by Harold Bloom and an introduction by Susannah Carson – also on reading Jane Austen, naturally. So far it is excellent, the only problem being the urge it creates to read Jane Austen rather than read about reading Jane Austen, but it’s a problem I can live with. I do suspect my next read will be one of the novels, though…

Today’s taster is from the first essay, by Susanna Clarke, putting into words something that has bothered me too about the way people talk about Darcy:

Darcy has somehow been redefined in recent years as a dark, brooding, romantic hero. I’ve seen him mentioned with Heathcliff and Mr. Rochester as if they were all points on the same spectrum. But that’s not how Elizabeth or Jane Austen sees him. When Elizabeth thinks Darcy is arrogant, she isn’t attracted to him. She turns him down. It’s only when she sees him as a kind friend, a caring brother, and a good master that she begins to fall in love with him. If he makes other people happy, then he is capable of making her happy too. I doubt that Elizabeth is secretly or subconsciously attracted to a «dark» Darcy. Twenty-first-century women (and men) can afford to romanticize dark heroes because their fates and futures are in their own hands — Elizabeth didn’t have that option.

(p. 5)

More tasters can be found at Flukten fra virkeligheten.

Smakebit på søndag: Pudder? Pudder!

pudderHar såvidt begynt på Pudder? Pudder! eller: Sleeping Beauty in the Valley of the Wild, Wild Pigs av Tor Åge Bringsværd i dag. Så langt er den mest forvirrende, men det er ikke så uvanlig fra den kanten, det blir nok bedre.

Da vi hadde passert Holmenkollen tre ganger, gikk jeg av. Jeg mener: Det er grenser for hvor mange ganger det er morsomt å se en hoppbakke. Jeg mener: Uansett hvor gammel den er. Og naturligvis ville det vært morsomt om det hadde vært vinter – i hvert fall én av gangene – men du kan ikke få med deg alt heller.

(s. 6)

Flere smakebiter finner du hos Flukten fra virkeligheten.

De beste blant oss – Helene Uri

helene_uriJeg har i grunn hatt lyst til å lese Helene Uris De beste blant oss siden den kom ut. Når den dukket opp på Mammutsalget for et år eller to siden kjøpte jeg den derfor. Etter det har den blitt stående og vente på en passende anledning, og når det var tid for å lese en norsk bok i Thereses nordiske utfordring i mars ble det Helene Uri jeg plukket frem. (Ja, jeg leste den i mars, jeg er bare litt treig til å blogge for tiden.)

Og det er jeg glad for. Livet ved Futling – Institutt for futuristisk lingvistikk – ved Universitetet i Oslo er lett gjenkjenbart på mange måter om man noensinne har oppholdt seg på et norsk universitet, i det minste om man har bedrevet humanistiske studier. Helene Uri har selv vært ansatt som lingvist og bør derfor vite hva hun snakker om, og hun beskriver det på en slik måte at jeg blir sittende og ikke vite om jeg skal le eller gråte. Dette er et godt eksempel, fra ganske tidlig i boka:

Et annet sentralt mandat for Institutt for futuristisk lingvistikk er å arbeide for å bevare norsk som bruksspråk i Norge. Hun som er ansvarlig for prosjektet Maintenance of Norwegian as the Future Language of Norway, har spurt om det hadde vært mulig å publisere iallfall deler av arbeidet på norsk, men det måtte instituttledelsen avvise, for med norsk som publiseringsspråk kan resultatene bare publiseres i norske, til nød skandinaviske, tidsskrifter, det gir ikke nok credits, som igjen er grunnlaget for kommende års bevilgninger til Futling.

Side 98. Det er nok fiksjon, men det ville slett ikke forundre meg om et lignende prosjekt eksisterer i virkelighetene og har fått akkurat det samme svaret på det samme spørsmålet.

Og jeg liker hovedpersonene til Uri. Jeg liker Pål Bentzen, som kanskje har fått en jobb han ikke fortjener og som egentlig er mer interessert i språkhistorie enn i futuristisk lingvistikk. Jeg liker Påls mor, som skriver kioskromaner av beste sort. Og jeg liker Edith Rinkel, tross hennes asosiale tendenser og hennes tilsynelatende hensynsløshet.

Det er vanskelig å si noe om handlingen uten å røpe for mye. Jeg slet litt med «spenningskurven» i og med at når jeg hadde femti sider igjen av boka føltes det som om handlingen skulle til å starte og at alt før bare hadde vært introduksjon og opptakt. Ikke at det gikk treigt å lese eller noe slikt, men oppbyggingen av historien var uvanlig. Det skjedde til gjengjeld en hel masse i løpet av de gjenværende få sidene, så på sett og vis var følelsen min rett, og boka som helhet fungerte utmerket.

Jeg skal nok lese mer av Helene Uri.

En smakebit på søndag: Hoppsan, jag är död!

paasilinna_dod

Det har vært stille her i det siste, jeg har hatt et par travle måneder med lite overskudd. Lest har jeg gjort, men ikke blogget. Skal prøve å skjerpe meg… I mellomtiden begynner jeg i alle fall med en smakebit fra boken jeg leser nå, Arto Paasilinnas Hoppsan, jag är död!

Tanken på att jag var död kändes faktisk ganska angenäm. Det här äktenskapet tedde sig inte längre så lyckat. Förr eller senare skulle det ha blivit skilsmässa. I och med att jag hade råkat dö löste det ju sig med den ledsamma saken också.

Flere smakebiter finner du på Flukten fra virkeligheten.