Not quite 5×5

Friday Five (with some missing answers):

1. List your five favorite beverages.
Coffee (plain black), tea (PG Tips w/milk), sparkling water, English Cider and uhm, single malt scotch whisky. Whisky is a beverage, right?

2. List your five favorite websites.
nmwl.no (shameless self-promotion)
me(ish)
nettavisen
CentralOps.net tools
Webmonkey

3. List your five favorite snack foods.
Popcorn
Tortilla chips
Cheese & crackers
Chocolate

4. List your five favorite board and/or card games.
Trivial Pursuit
Passport
“Vri åtter”
Mah-jong
Monopoly

5. List your five favorite computer and/or game system games.
Tetris
Space Invaders
Mah-jong
Monopoly

Sigh

Due to all this dancing malarkey I have aquired some sort of ankle/shin infection. A couple of weeks ago – just after the ball, I obviously had an infection around the shin bone (tibia). That’s sort of gone, now. Though I still get twinges I suspect they’re partly imaginary. What’s obviously not quite right is my ankles. I suppose they were probably complaining earlier, too, but were overpowered by the shins, but now I find I have this vague ache just around the metatarsal bones and occasionally when I walk or simply move my foot I get a sudden burst of pain. I had one just now which was sharp enough to make me hold my breath until it had subsided somewhat, but usually it’s more a sort of nudge: “We’re still here and we’d appreciate some rest.” I’ve been trying to give them a break, of course. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to avoid walking when you’re used to walking everywhere? I’d have had to call in sick, for starters, which would have been highly inconvenient, to say the least.

Which is one of the reasons I’m very glad Christmas is almost here. I could quite definitely do with a couple of days of simply putting my feet up and doing pretty exactly nothing.

Ah. Bliss.

Uhm. Damn. I knew there was a hitch… It’ll be boyfriendless bliss – i.e. not bliss at all.

Voice in my head: Alanis Morissette – Ironic

Yay!

That’s all of my presents sorted! I had most of them done by the end of Friday (including the tricky “extra” ones), and this evening I found a slip from the post office in my mailbox to pick up the last one. Very pleased with that, as I wasn’t 100% sure it’d get here in time for Christmas (the drawback to shopping on the internet when you’re running late…).

I suppose

it’s one’s duty to comment on the BBC’s Big Read. 21 books in the final running to be proclaimed “the UK’s Best-Loved Book”. And Tolkien won. Well, what else can you expect when the poll is done while the films are coming out? I suppose he would have been up there even if it weren’t for the films, but I still suspect the result of being influenced by them. Most likely Colin Firth diving into the pond must take some of the blame (credit?) for Jane Austen’s second place, as well. The fact that I am much more partial to dear Jane (Tolkien would be unlikely to make my list at all, unfortunately), does not blind me completely. The Potter hysteria, of course, has also been fed by the films. In fact, all the more credit to Pullman (whose books are pretty good though I detested his mythology when I read them last time – must consider a reread) for making the third spot with no films to bump him up. Adams, of course, should always be near the top of such lists, as should Milne. Harper Lee is currently high on my TBR list, so I can’t really comment.

This is the official top 21:

1. The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien
2. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
3. His Dark Materials, Philip Pullman
4. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
5. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, JK Rowling
6. To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
7. Winnie the Pooh, AA Milne
8. Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell
9. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis
10. Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë
11. Catch-22, Joseph Heller
12. Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë
13. Birdsong, Sebastian Faulks
14. Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier
15. The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger
16. The Wind in the Willows, Kenneth Grahame
17. Great Expectations, Charles Dickens
18. Little Women, Louisa May Alcott
19. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin, Louis de Bernieres
20. War and Peace, Leo Tolstoy
21. Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell

And here, as further comment, the “same” top 21 according to me (minus the ones I haven’t actually read).

1. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
2. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
3. Winnie the Pooh, AA Milne
4. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis
5. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, JK Rowling
6. The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger
7. War and Peace, Leo Tolstoy
8. His Dark Materials, Philip Pullman
9. The Wind in the Willows, Kenneth Grahame
10. The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien
10. Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë
10. Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë
10. Little Women, Louisa May Alcott
14. Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell
14. Great Expectations, Charles Dickens
14. Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell

The last three would not have made my top 100 list, the four at 10 might have, but would have been a lot further down. And other books would have squeezed into the top nine, but at least those belong up there somewhere. I’d also like to note that I prefer several of the other Narnia books to TLtWatW, and I would put the Dirk Gently novels ahead of the Hitch-Hiker series. I can never make up my mind whether P&P or Emma is my favourite Austen novel. Winnie the Pooh (which, btw, should be Winnie-the-Pooh) isn’t necessarily Milne’s best either.

Oh well.

Go see if you can beat me on the quiz – I got 8/10.

Hahahaha

Siden det snart er jul og alle fyker rundt som besatt og forsøker å finne ut av hva de skal gi til svigermødre, nevøer, onkler, kjærester og andre dyr er selvsagt alle avisene fulle av gode råd for hva du skal kjøpe og hva du skal ungå. I all hovedsak er disse artiklene ganske idiotiske, men gårsdagens i Adressa tar muligens kaka: Hva kvinner vil ha. Først kan vi le litt av den som er noen dager gammel: hva menn vil ha. Til tross for at forfatteren er mann, stiller jeg meg noe tvilende til “ønskelista” han har kommet fram til. For menn er visstnok

årets sikkerstikk (…) DVD-boksen med Ringenes Herre: To Tårn. Denne inneholder fire DVD-plater med masse ekstramatriale. Garantert å holde ham klistret foran skjermen mens mor er ute med venninnene og feirer 2. juledag på byen.

Skal vi se… Joda, pappa lot seg dra med på Ringens Brorskap og synes den var helt ok, men likte boka bedre. Han ser sjelden film og ser dem aldri om igjen. Han har ikke dvd-spiller, forresten. Broren min ville kanskje satt pris på dette, men ville satt langt større pris på f.eks. dvd-boks med Stanley Kubrik filmer. Hovedproblemet med dette tipset er selvsagt at de mannfolka jeg kjenner som faktisk vil ha To Tårn allerede har den. Hallo? Den har vært i butikkene i ukesvis!

En Xbox. PC har han allerede fra før.

Ja, for ingen menn har Xbox fra før. Tips: Sjekk på forhånd. Sjekk også på forhånd at han ikke hater Xbox og egentlig ønsker seg PS2, f.eks.

Menn vil visstnok ikke ha hverken boxershorts, slips eller verktøy. Dette skal jeg ikke uttale meg for sterkt om, det kan hende det stemmer. Men om det “tross alt” er “bedre å kjøpe en tettsittende leopard-string truse som han aldri kommer til å bruke. (Bortsett fra den ene gangen da han av ren nysjerrighet vil se hvordan han tar seg ut i den).” Se, det stiller jeg meg også tvilende til. I hvert fall siden artikkelen ikke på noe tidspunkt utelukker alle andre menn enn “mannen i ditt liv”. Kanskje forfatteren har rett? Kanskje det er dette bestefar har ønsket seg i alle år?

Allikevel er det definitivt mest moro å hente i artikkelen som omhandler hva kvinner vil ha. Noen – i følge forfatteren – enkle, men essensielle regler:

1. Uansett hva du kjøper så sørg for at det kan byttes. Det er en universell lov som sier at uansett hvor mye tid, omtanke og krefter du legger i julegavekjøpet til henne, så vil hun uansett bytte det i noe annet 2. juledag.

Nå skal jeg ikke snakke for alle kvinner (det ville gjøre mine kommentarer like idiotiske som denne artikkelen), men jeg bytter ikke gaver. Ok, unntaket er CD’er og bøker som jeg har fra før (og hvis du virkelig har lagt tid og omtanke i kjøpet bør du ha sjekket hva jeg har på forhånd).

2. Kvinner liker myke pakker (harde pakker ser hun gjerne på som “praktiske” og en kvinne vil ikke ha en praktisk julegave, en kvinne vil føle at hun er elsket og liker gjerne å bli satt på pidestall denne tiden av året, harde pakker er kun tillatt om de er bittesmå og inneholder smykker til en verdi av en halv årslønn).

Ok, her har vi selvsagt den smykke-greia igjen. Siden jeg ikke bruker smykker er liksom det litt skivebom hvis det er meg du skal handle gaver til. Ellers er harde pakker helt topp, særlig hvis de f.eks. er bok-formet. Jeg er også praktisk nok anlagt til å like praktiske gaver, i hvert fall gaver som har nytteverdi utover et “å, så fint” på julaften for så å havne i en skuff og aldri tas fram igjen (særlig siden jeg ikke har skuffer i særlig stor grad).

Så de to første reglene kan i hver fall forkastes. De to neste – “Vi” liker å få to gaver, en “offisiell” og en som “bør være noe personlig og som symboliserer din utømmelige kjærlighet” og “vi” liker gaver vi kan vise oss fram i – er i hvert fall ikke helt høl i hue. Jeg skjønner ikke helt hvorfor ikke de to gavene kan være en og samme (med mindre du synes “utømmelig kjærlighet” best symboliseres med naglehalsbånd og håndjern – det kan bli en smule sterk kost for gamle slektninger) og jeg vil forsatt gjerne ha en bok (den kan jeg selvsagt vise meg fram med, men kanskje ikke i). Men vi leser videre…

Kvinner vil ha sko.

Jada, det vil vi. Men vi (jeg, i hvert fall) vil helst kjøpe dem selv – det er nemlig en fordel med sko som faktisk passer. Glem det.

Kvinner vil ha undertøy.

Sikkert. Men, ja, pass på at det er riktig størrelse. Og for min del er det faktisk en fordel om det er brukbart, derfor er det slett ikke noe galt med Sloggi. Når det er sagt ville jeg kanskje ikke satset på en tre-pack bomullsunderbukser som eneste julepresang. Samme hvor praktisk det (og jeg) er, er det også en smule kjedelig.

Kvinner vil ha parfyme.

Jo takk, men personlig ville jeg hverken brukt “Christian Dior, Estee Lauder, Elizabeth Arden [eller] Chanel”, med mulig unntak av det siste. Tips: Også dersom du har tenkt å kjøpe parfyme til kvinnen i ditt liv er det en fordel å kjenne henne såpass godt at du faktisk vet hva hun foretrekker.

Hva du enn gjør: ikke kjøp noe som kan brukes på kjøkkenet.

Neivel. Jeg ønsker meg faktisk brødbaker til jul, men det trenger vi ikke bry oss om, eller? Dessuten skulle jeg gjerne hatt en skikkelig food-processor. Jeg kan gå med på at det kanskje ikke er den mest romantiske presangen i verden, men det må da være bedre å kjøpe noe hun faktisk ønsker seg enn f.eks. feil parfyme? Ikke vil vi ha kokebøker heller, visstnok, hvilket også er nonsens.

Kvinner vil ikke ha mobiltelefoner, CD-plater, Video-filmer, ny TV eller noe som helst annet som også du selv kunne tenke deg.

Å jo da. Det vil vi det så. Men her gjelder en essensiell regel: Vær sikker på å kjøpe noe du faktisk tror hun vil ha, ikke bare noe du egentlig helst ville kjøpt til deg selv – og hvis dere bor sammen kan det være en idé å styre unna ting som er en presang til “begge to” – f.eks. ny tv – dette kommer også ann på kvinnen det er snakk om her og hva hun har snakket om at hun har lyst på. Ny mobiltelefon er helt fint (men rådet om å la være å forklare henne alle funksjonene kan det være lurt å legge seg på minnet). Xbox er helt fint hvis hun har lyst på Xbox, ikke fullt så fint hvis du har ønsket deg Xbox selv og ikke fått det og derfor kjøper det “til henne” i stedet. Ditto DVD-filmer, å kjøpe yndlingsfilmen din til henne kan være romantisk – det sier noe om deg og er derfor personlig – men det kommer litt ann på hva slags film det er og om hun har sett den før og hva hun da eventuellt mente om den. Bruk hue.

Kvinner vil ikke ha gavekort.

Det stemmer. Gavekort er upersonlig. Det finnes unntak, gavekort som bare kan brukes i en butikk du vet hun liker et sted dere har vært på ferie sammen og gjerne vil til igjen, for eksempel, viser at du faktisk har tenkt deg om litt. Gavekort som kan brukes på en hvilken som helst butikk på Oslo City ville jeg tatt som en personlig fornærmelse siden jeg hater å handle på Oslo City.

Generellt er selvsagt disse artiklene like dumme som de andre artiklene jeg har kommentert i det siste som deler inn menneskene i båser etter hvilket kjønn de er. Å kjøpe vellykkede gaver krever at du kjenner personen du skal kjøpe til og gidder å bruke litt tid og energi på å tenke. Det er ikke verre enn det.

Addendum: Meg forklarer poenget enda bedre. Kanskje norske aviser burde tipses om ‘Tis slik at de får bedre grunnmateriale for alle de idiotiske juleartiklene sine?

MM 3.50

I suppose I might as well do the last couple of Monday Missions, as I’ll probably miss the MM once PromoGuy has put it to rest.

1. What in your life used to be fun, but eventually just became a chore that you didn’t enjoy?
Towards the end of my Master’s degree I was pretty sick of academia in general. It was more a case of needing a break than anyhting else, though. Mind you, the break’s lasted for quite a long time now, hasn’t it?

2. This weekend, US Troops captured Saddam Hussein and now have him in custody. How did you feel when you heard the news? Did it change your mind about the War in Iraq? Did it change your opinion of President Bush?
Relief that they’ve got him, but no, it didn’t change my feelings about the war or about Bush – I’m still pretty much opposed to both.

3. Regarding the capture of Saddam, I saw one “man on the street” interview where a man grumbled that “they should have just killed Saddam. I don’t know why they bothered taking him alive.” What do you think, should US Troops have taken Saddam alive or just killed him when they found him? What would be the pros and cons of either?
Well, as I’m against the death penalty, I’m not particularly in favour of lynchings either…

4. What kind of things at Christmas time just scream “tacky” and “White Trash” when you seem them?
Most multicoloured lights. Fake Christmas trees in general, especially those that aren’t even green (white and glittery? yikes! gold? lord help us).

5. Suppose you had a dear friend who calls you in tears because her boyfriend had just left her. They’d been together for nearly 5 years, and one day he announces to her that he is leaving because she had gained too much weight. They were in love, or so she thought, and then out of the blue, he bails and blames it on her weight. What would you say to her about this man?
What can you say except “Forget him. Now.”? Not that she would be able to, but there’s really nothing else to say, is there?

6. Suppose this same friend of yours still thinks she and her ex have a future. She says that she wants another chance, that if he will make some changes, she will to. She really does love him, and assures you that he loves her, even though he wants to “take a break and see other people, but if we were meant to be together we will be.” There is even a hint of marriage in their future if they get back together. What advice would you give her?
“Forget him. Now.”

7. Have you ever had to tell a lie to get out of a date or when you were breaking up with someone? What did you tell them and how did they take it? Did they ever find out the truth?
Lie? Not as such, no. I don’t suppose I’ve told the whole truth, or even the most important part of the truth very often, but I’ve never had to resort to lies either.

Hindsight is 20/20

Looking for the 2002 Mayfly entry I found myself rereading old entries. It’s illuminating. And funny. Specifically, I still go all gooey (even more so, in fact, as I now know what it feels like), the “False alarm” cry was obviously a false alarm (“Beklager feil, ny feil følger.”), in fact, the whole month of March is pretty amusing. Yes: March. I did take my time, didn’t I? Thanks for sticking around, dear. It’s much appreciated.

Rereading, I also noticed how, the closer I got to deciding I really was falling in love rather than imagining it, the less I blogged about it, apart from the occasional cryptic reference. Which might explain why Donna was so surprised at the first mention of the word “boyfriend”.

Mmmm. Boyfriend.

Born. Eat. Shag. Die.

It’s that time of year again. You get to sum up your year in 20 words. Or, at least, I’m going to. Just have to take a day or two to think. But then the year’s not over yet. I have:

Never ending project at work. Sociability, too much sociability? Love? Love! Scotland again and again. Still no kitchen. But love.

Born. Eat. Shag. Die. The Mayfly Project is back.

In the meantime Also – my entry for 2002.

Voices in my head: Les Mis Symphonic Cast – Look Down (streets of Paris version)

C-c-c-cold

Ok, so it’s Monday

1. Do you enjoy the cold weather and snow for the holidays?
The cold weather? Not really. I like snow for Christmas, though – I wish it would arrive soon. It’s too dark without it.

2. What is your ideal holiday celebration? How, where, with whom would you celebrate to make things perfect?
With my family, which is what I’m doing. I’d prefer to be at my parents’ rather than my grandparents’, but they can’t travel so we have to come to them. I’ll be missing Martin, but that can’t be helped.

3. Do you do have any holiday traditions?
Of course. Tree, watching “Tre nøtter til Askepott”, eating too much, driving to Trondheim on Christmas Day (or the day after, but it had better be Christmas Day this year).

4. Do you do anything to help the needy?
For Christmas specifically? No. What I do do is sposor two children (one in Mali, one in Indonesia), but that’s year round. As is other things I do for “charity”. Except I tend to buy charity Christmas cards. That’s something, I suppose.

5. What one gift would you like for yourself?
Lars Lerin‘s watercolour of Glasgow Station – currently on display at Oslo Kunstforening (until the 23rd). It’s only 50000 NOK (about 6000 USD)… I’d also like to have Martin there for Christmas. Which is about as unlikely as getting the watercolour. So I’ll settle for a good book.